Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 39(1): 62-68, Jan.-Mar. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-844174

ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate and compare the effect of self-reported long-term health conditions and sociodemographic factors on perceived health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: A population-based survey of adults (18 to 65 years) living in Brasilia, Brazil, was conducted in 2012. Descriptive and multivariate analyses using a Tobit model were performed with data on sociodemographic variables, self-reported conditions, and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health states, providing utility scores (preferred health state) between 0 and 1 for HRQoL estimates. Results: The mean utility of 1,820 adults interviewed (mean age: 38.4±12.6 years) was 0.883 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.874-0.892), with 76.2% in the highest utility range (0.8 to 1.0). EQ-5D dimensions with moderate problems were pain/discomfort (33.8%) and anxiety/depression (20.5%). Serious problems were reported by only 0.3% of the sample in the mobility and self-care domain and by 3.1% in the pain/discomfort domain. Multivariate analysis revealed reduced HRQoL in individuals with depression, diabetes, and hypertension. Living in satellite towns (outside the city core), belonging to a lower economic class, or not being formally employed were also associated with decreased HRQoL. Beta coefficients for these impacts ranged from -0.033 (not formally employed) to -0.141 (depression), reflecting the strongest impact. Conclusion: Of the long-term health conditions studied, depression had the greatest impact on HRQoL. Social class, employment status, and place of residence also affected HRQoL.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Quality of Life/psychology , Self Concept , Chronic Disease/psychology , Depression/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Population Surveillance , Health Status , Cross-Sectional Studies
2.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 36(3): 262-270, Jul-Sep/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-718442

ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder, as assessed in population-based cross-sectional studies of Brazilian adults. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature. The major databases were searched up through October 2013. Two researchers selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed their methodological quality. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects. Results: Of the 2,971 records retrieved, we selected 27 studies that assessed the prevalence of depression morbidity in 464,734 individuals (66% women). Eleven different screening tools were used to assess depression morbidity. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 14% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 13-16; I2 = 99.5%), whereas the 1-year prevalence of major depressive disorder was 8% (95%CI 7-10; I2 = 86.7%), and the lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder was 17% (95%CI 14-19; I2 = 91.6%). All rates were higher in women than in men. No causes of heterogeneity could be identified. Conclusion: Depression morbidity was common among Brazilian adults, and affects more women than men. Inconsistencies across studies highlight the need for standardization of future research. Clinicians should routinely investigate for the presence of depression morbidity in this population. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors
3.
Cad. saúde pública ; 29(supl.1): s167-s177, Nov. 2013. graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-690744

ABSTRACT

Antídotos e determinados medicamentos são essenciais ao tratamento de algumas intoxicações e não podem sofrer falhas no abastecimento, sob o risco de prejudicar a saúde e a segurança da população. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a disponibilidade de antídotos e medicamentos recomendados para o tratamento de intoxicações no Brasil. A partir de consensos internacionais, foram selecionados 41 antídotos para análise, todos sem patente em vigência. Desses, 27 são registrados, porém 11 estão disponíveis em formas inadequadas ao tratamento de intoxicações, restando 16 medicamentos comercialmente disponíveis. Somente um terço dos medicamentos necessários para o tratamento de intoxicações está incluído na relação de medicamentos essenciais do país. Em adição, é apresentada proposta de suprimento das demandas a um dos antídotos, anticorpo antidigoxina, considerando a capacidade de produção nacional de imunobiológicos. Os resultados demonstram limitação da assistência adequada aos pacientes intoxicados no país e reforçam a necessidade urgente de políticas públicas na área.


Antidotes and certain other drugs are essential for treating some types of poisoning. Failures in their supply can jeopardize the population's health and safety. The current study aimed to assess the availability of antidotes and other drugs used in the treatment of poisonings in Brazil. International guidelines were used as the basis for selecting 41 antidotes for analysis, none of which currently protected by patents. Of these, 27 are registered in Brazil, but 11 of these are available in inadequate forms for treating poisoning, leaving 16 commercially available antidotes. Only one-third of the drugs needed for treating poisoning are included in the country's list of essential drugs. The article also presents a proposal for supplying the demand for one of the antidotes, anti-digoxin antibody, considering Brazil's domestic capacity for manufacturing immunobiologicals. The study's results show the limitations to adequate treatment for poison victims in Brazil and reinforce the urgent need to strengthen public policies in this area.


Los antídotos y determinados medicamentos son esenciales para el tratamiento de algunas intoxicaciones, y su disponibilidad no puede fallar, o la salud y la seguridad de la población se ponen en peligro. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la disponibilidad de antídotos y fármacos recomendados para el tratamiento por intoxicaciones en Brasil. Se seleccionaron para el análisis 41 antídotos de reconocido consenso internacional, todos ellos sin patentes en vigor. Veintisiete estaban registrados en Brasil, pero 11 se venden en preparados farmacéuticos, no apropiados para el tratamiento de intoxicaciones, lo que da como resultado 16 medicamentos disponibles en el mercado. Sólo se incluyen en la lista brasileña de medicamentos esenciales un tercio de los medicamentos necesarios para tratar intoxicaciones. Además, se presenta una propuesta para suplir uno de los antídotos, anticuerpo antidigoxina, considerando la capacidad de producción nacional. Los resultados muestran limitaciones en una atención adecuada a los pacientes intoxicados en Brasil y refuerzan la necesidad urgente de fortalecer las políticas públicas en este ámbito.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antidotes/supply & distribution , Drugs, Essential/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Brazil , Poisoning/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL